Well I to just recieved a call from a Steve Day, actually two of which the first my son picked up because I was working. He proceeding to tell him he was an investigator for the courts and that I have a legal matter that if not taken care of will end up in court. My son replied that if it truely was a legal matter it would be on case net ( of which it is not) then he proceeded to use foul lanaguage and threaten him. Don't get smart with me your not a lawyer.....How would you know he is not a lawyer. A few more words exchanged. Then he called again today while I was working and gave my daughter the same info, this time without the foul lanaguage. these people have called before saying I have an unpaid internet loan I have not had one of those pay day loans in 6 years, he then asked me to fax over my bank account information along with a promise to pay letter to a number right away to avoid collection. Also they asked for Social security numbers and dates of birth. WHAT? If u really worked for the pay day loan company you would have all of that and why would I have to fax any of that?
I never did that I told them that they could speak to my attorney, never heard back from them for 6 months now here we go again. I'm filing a complaint with the Attorney Generals office. Not to mention I'm pretty sure they are not suppose to give my personal information over the phone to anyone that answers. ( ohand when they call you can hear all the other people in the background talking so pretty sure it is a call center not a invesigators office as he protrays to me)
There is also claim that the bussiness was sold from the previous owner and he was the problem try again they still are in the wrong.
Thank you Karen Zeno for your comment. It's not considered "slander" when your speaking the truth and identifying yourselves as "officers of the court" is a felony. So what several of us did was make copies of these complaints where Steve Gilbert is identifying himself as such and resubmitted them to the Mo Atty General and Div of Finance. Bon appetite! Guess you forgot about the 25 collectors who quit after 2 hours to 1 day when they realized the teqnique you guys were using. We've also given the authorities their name and addresses so they can verify the claim. So witch, don't threaten me at any time.
First of all my name is not karen. Furthermore, SKA has never had 25 collectors & nobody ever walked out .. You are full of all kinds of bull @.. Your remarks are not only "Lies" but are a far toss of actual reality. There is no Laws being broken by the representaion of a Litigation investigators. Thats exactly what we do.. If you had any knowledge of the collection laws & regulations you would have found this out a long time ago. So again we are suggesting that you take your medication because we all feel that you are "DELOUSIONAL" as you were when you worked for "SKA Please find somebody to talk too.. such a a therapist !
Well I to just recieved a call from a Steve Day, actually two of which the first my son picked up because I was working. He proceeding to tell him he was an investigator for the courts and that I have a legal matter that if not taken care of will end up in court. My son replied that if it truely was a legal matter it would be on case net ( of which it is not) then he proceeded to use foul lanaguage and threaten him. Don't get smart with me your not a lawyer.....How would you know he is not a lawyer. A few more words exchanged. Then he called again today while I was working and gave my daughter the same info, this time without the foul lanaguage. these people have called before saying I have an unpaid internet loan I have not had one of those pay day loans in 6 years, he then asked me to fax over my bank account information along with a promise to pay letter to a number right away to avoid collection. Also they asked for Social security numbers and dates of birth. WHAT? If u really worked for the pay day loan company you would have all of that and why would I have to fax any of that?
I never did that I told them that they could speak to my attorney, never heard back from them for 6 months now here we go again. I'm filing a complaint with the Attorney Generals office. Not to mention I'm pretty sure they are not suppose to give my personal information over the phone to anyone that answers. ( ohand when they call you can hear all the other people in the background talking so pretty sure it is a call center not a invesigators office as he protrays to me)
There is also claim that the bussiness was sold from the previous owner and he was the problem try again they still are in the wrong.
this lady marie is not telling a story her story is the truth steve gilbert is a crack head thats why not once did he say it was a lie i use to work at ska to i left after 2 months of hearing them lie and steal clients and debtors money reggie smith the old owner use to treat his workers like [***] and have females employes do sex favors or lose there job...fact steve was sleeping and smoking crack in the office
have been receiving calls this week for at least twice a day asking for my son. I KNOW he doesnt a payday loan (reading the blogs) because he hasnt been on a job long enough and has been out of work since Sep, after only working for 3 months. he is calling himself a litigation investigator, but according to litigation law a litigator is an experienced lawyer with training in dealing with criminal cases and civil cases dealing with personal injuries, not debt collections. He or his company should be reported to the MO bar association to see if he has obtain any training or certification/licensing either as a litigator or investigator. case below,is not exact but further research can come up with solution.
Law Firms and Associations
Unauthorized Practice of Law
Opinion Number: 950270 - Rule Number: 5.5
QUESTION: Attorney represents a collection agency. The agency will refer matters to Attorney for collection through litigation. The agency will refer the matter directly, rather than the creditor hiring Attorney. The agency will require Attorney to pay the agency a set fee on each matter for administrative expenses. May Attorney pay this fee? ANSWER: The agreement which Attorney has submitted raises several concerns under the Rules of Professional Conduct. First, the fee would be either a prohibited referral fee under Rule 4-7.2(c) or improper fee splitting with a non-attorney under Rule 4-5.4(a). The other concerns raised cannot be fully addressed without information about disclosures, waivers and arrangements with the creditor, the actual client. The arrangement described causes concerns under Rule 4-1.6 related to confidentiality and under Rule 4-1.7(b) related to potential conflicts of interest. Additionally, this arrangement raises the concern that Attorney would be violating Rule 4-5.5 assisting the unauthorized practice of law by this company. Attorney may wish to study State ex rel. McKittrick v. C.S. Dudley & Co., Inc., 102 S.W.2d 895 (Mo. 1937). That case involved a collections company in a situation which appears similar to the situation of the collection agency in the opinion request