I have received several calls from this number. Claims to be a James Brooks with Legal Services. Claims I owe for a pay day loan and that they are issuing warrants for my arrest if I don't pay them today. Called local police and nothing is issued in my name and that this is most likely a scam.
I have received several calls from this number. Claims to be a James Brooks with Legal Services. Claims I owe for a pay day loan and that they are issuing warrants for my arrest if I don't pay them today. Called local police and nothing is issued in my name and that this is most likely a scam.
all i can say is my wife went to court and had to pay extreme fees. easiest thing we could have done is pay back the money we loaned. here is some tips for MI
Bad Check Cases
A Person who legitimately maintain, or previously maintained a valid checking account can be prosecuted for several different crimes depending upon the circumstances.
The offense of No Account Check is a 2 year maximum felony, with a fine of not more than $500, or both. For the offense of No Account Check, the Prosecution must prove the following beyond a reasonable doubt:
1) That on a particular date the Defendant wrote or delivered a check, draft, or money order to a named individual or entity for a specific dollar amount;
2) The check, draft, or money order was drawn on a particular bank;
3) When he or she did this, the Defendant did not have an account or credit with the particular bank;
4) When he or she wrote or delivered the check, draft, or money order, the Defendant intended to defraud or cheat someone.
5) The check, draft, or money order was presented for payment.
The offense of 3 Non Sufficient Funds Checks within 10 days is a 2 year maximum felony, with a fine of not more than $500, or both. For the offense of 3 Non Sufficient Fund (NSF) Checks within 10 days the Prosecution must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1) The Defendant wrote or delivered 3 checks for a particular dollar amount
2) When he or she did this, the Defendant did not have enough money or credit with the particular bank to pay any of the checks in full;
3) When he or she wrote or delivered the check, draft, or money order, the Defendant knew that he or she did not have enough money or credit to pay any of them in full.
4) When he or she wrote or delivered each of the 3 checks, drafts, or money orders, the Defendant intended to defraud or cheat someone.
For the offense of Nonsufficient Funds (NSF) Check, the Prosecution must prove the following elements beyond a reasonable doubt:
1) That on a particular date the Defendant wrote or delivered a check, draft, or money order to a named individual or entity for a specific dollar amount;
2) The check, draft, or money order was drawn on a particular bank;
3) The check, draft, or money order was signed and endorsed by a particular individual.
4) When he or she wrote or delivered the check, draft, or money order, the Defendant knew that he or she did not have enough money or credit at the particular bank to pay any it in full. OR when the check, draft, or money order was presented for payment, there were not sufficient funds at the particular bank to pay it in full and the Defendant knew when he or she wrote the check, draft, or money order that there would not be enough money or credit to pay it in full when it was presented.
5) When he or she wrote or delivered the check, draft, or money order, the Defendant intended to defraud or cheat someone.
6) The check, draft, or money order was in one of the following amounts:
a) $500 or more;
b) $100 or more but less than $500;
c) some amount less than $100.
The possible penalties for Non Sufficient Funds (NSF) Check are as follows:
1) In cases where there are 2 prior NSF convictions, the offense is a 2 year maximum felony or a fine of not more than $2,000 or 3 times the amount payable, whichever is greater, or both imprisonment and a fine;
2) If the amount payable in the check, draft, or money order is $100 or more but less than $500, either of the following apply:
a) For a first or second offense, a 1 year maximum misdemeanor or a fine of more than $1,000 or 3 times the amount payable, whichever is greater, or both imprisonment and a fine;
b) For an offense following 2 or more prior NSF convictions, the offense is a 2 year maximum felony or a fine of not more than $2,000, or both imprisonment and a fine (a conviction for attempted NSF check under $100 is not counted in determining prior NSF convictions here);
3) For an offense following 1 or more prior NSF convictions involving $100 or less, a 1 year maximum misdemeanor or a fine of more than $1,000, or both imprisonment and a fine;
4) For a first offense, a 93 day maximum misdemeanor, or a fine of not more than $500, or both.
If the Defendant knew when he or she wrote the check, draft, or money order that he or she did not have enough money in the bank to cover it at the time, but had good reason to believe that the check, draft, or money order would be paid when it was presented for payment, then the Defendant did not have the intent to defraud or cheat anyone. If the Defendant wrote the check, draft, or money order when he or she did not have enough money in the bank account because he or she made an honest mistake about how much money he or she had in his or her account, there is also not an intent to defraud.
I just got 3 phone calls from this number in a row in a matter of 3 minutes!!! The other day I had a scammer call about a payday loan that I had never received and threatened me with jail and other stuff. This time the background sounded no different when my answering machine came on. In this country an amount owed is a civil matter. Nobody is going to come and arrest for this. I talked to my local sheriff and they told me. They also told me it sounded like a scam and most a persons information can be pulled up on the web by anyone. They are unsure how my ss# was found, but apparently that can be obtained somewhere as well. Because this number left no message, I am sure it is the same thing. Watch out for yourself!!!
mr james brooks gets around.. he has "worked" for several companies, at least once a year i get a call from him, this time he called a number i never give out. he says the same thing everytime, but when i call local police they tell me there are no warrants and if there was i would have received something in the mail. i was told to file a comlaint with federal trade commission and the attorney general.