CNAM was 'Walmart'. Call to Walmart Corp. indicated that's not one of their numbers and connected me to FTC. Got a snippy Ms. Vanessa who took my info to file a complaint. Gave Ref # in order to follow up. [ see similar at 928-235-8037 as noted below ]
When this number is called back, one gets 'Ext. 1010 is unavailable' and further outgoing that says 'Sorry, but the user's mail box can't accept more messages.'
Have gotten this with SEVERAL other unsolicited calls when called back with the same voice and outgoing msg, so obviously an illicit entity that's using multiple numbers. These aren't likely spoofed or else one wouldn't get the same outgoing UNLESS they're spoofing some innocent co. who has several ph. nos. with that outgoing msg which I find highly unlikely.
One of these other numbers which I've posted about on 800Notes is 928-235-8037 - 'SAFFORD AZ'.
**> Perhaps if others reported getting calls that can be tied to this same group the FTC will have enough to go on to take action... i.e. call back and determine if outgoing is the same as above [ preferably from a CNAM / CID Blocked line ]... <**
CNAM was 'Walmart'. Call to Walmart Corp. indicated that's not one of their numbers and connected me to FTC. Got a snippy Ms. Vanessa who took my info to file a complaint. Gave Ref # in order to follow up. [ see similar at 928-235-8037 as noted below ]
When this number is called back, one gets 'Ext. 1010 is unavailable' and further outgoing that says 'Sorry, but the user's mail box can't accept more messages.'
Have gotten this with SEVERAL other unsolicited calls when called back with the same voice and outgoing msg, so obviously an illicit entity that's using multiple numbers. These aren't likely spoofed or else one wouldn't get the same outgoing UNLESS they're spoofing some innocent co. who has several ph. nos. with that outgoing msg which I find highly unlikely.
One of these other numbers which I've posted about on 800Notes is 928-235-8037 - 'SAFFORD AZ'.
**> Perhaps if others reported getting calls that can be tied to this same group the FTC will have enough to go on to take action... i.e. call back and determine if outgoing is the same as above [ preferably from a CNAM / CID Blocked line ]... <**