Received several voicemails requesting call back. Addressed to a Mrs Brown mostly, but one was addressed to a Mr n Mrs Larson or Lawson. None of which are me. I thought it was just a wrong number till they left a message for a different person.. Thanks for the posts. I will continue to screen the calls.
I had some guy name Sean Wilson or Williams call me from this number and said "it would serve me best to return call ASAP" Of course i ignored it. Then the next day i received a call from my landlord stating this Sean guy called him on his cell phone asking questions about my banking account, where I worked at, all kinds of questions. He told my landlord that he has some legal documents to serve me with. My land lord gave him my work information. He also called my wifes parents and my x girlfriend from 6 years ago. He also called my sister in law. I tried to call him back but by that time my wife had been served for me.
I tried to negotiate the debt before the court date, but they refused. I was now dealing with some in the legal department. Finally 2 days before the hearing. He returned my call and allowed me to pay the whole account in 3 payments of 1050.00 or so. He then dismissed the case and updated my credit. My advise is sto respond to any calls you get from this guy or your are asking fore trouble
...is obvious. REAL process servers do not call you, they just show up!
You say "I waited around and then some one showed up at my job to serve me. Luckily I called this number to a Charles Latham or Lofton something like that , he was able to stop the servcice and offer a settlement for half the balance. I paid it and it took 45 days to be deleted off my credit."
So what is it? You got served, or you didn't? There's no such thing as paying to "stop the service". Oh, and the old "deleted off my credit" - wrong again. If you pay, it may show up as paid, but still shows how delinquent the account was and will stay on your credit report for up to 7 years!
In other words - you would have been better off writing a fairytale. It would have been much more believable!
First off we all know that it would not be "removed" from your credit report but would be on there for 7 years, and would simply state that it was in collections and that you eventually paid it. So that it a blatant lie. But then hey, you seemed to have lied when you took out the loan, credit card, whatever and told them you would pay it back as agreed, so that makes you a habitual liar.
Now as to stopping the service, once the court papers are filed and a court date and docket are set, that cannot be resolved without at least the plaintiff dropping the case which would take several days at the least. So I guess that is your third lie? Beginning to look like you are a pathological liar to me.