I may be wrong in my initial appraisal of your services but you accept an apology that I have not offered nor will I ever given your arrogant demeanor. Arrogance is an undesireable quality at the negotiating table where diplomacy is key. You're only revealing your liability to your clients.
Your explanation of settlement is wanting; I found a better one elsewhere. And I would call a company that obtains out-of-court settlements a law firm, not a settlement firm, but you're not a lawyer, are you? It's a reach for a non-lawyer settlement firm to claim it gets out-of-court settlements; perhaps you should tone down your rhetoric. If you were a law firm, creditors would have to deal with you but since you're not, the law allows creditors to completely ignore you. Do your clients understand that their creditors have no legal obligation to deal with you at all?
No we settle not collect. Since you are not versed in English. I will explain. A collector collects debt. A settlement firm settles debt. If you had a business and had a lawsuit or judgmnet against your company and I/we obtained an out of court settlement and saved your company lets say 20,000 I would be a sttlement firm...see the difference. One company collects past debts. We settle them out of court we work for the defendant. Clearer picture now. I accept your apology.
A BK has its place but not everyone can qualify for a total liquidation. Am I correct? Also not everyone should claim a BK. Right? Every case is different
I may be wrong in my initial appraisal of your services but you accept an apology that I have not offered nor will I ever given your arrogant demeanor. Arrogance is an undesireable quality at the negotiating table where diplomacy is key. You're only revealing your liability to your clients.
Your explanation of settlement is wanting; I found a better one elsewhere. And I would call a company that obtains out-of-court settlements a law firm, not a settlement firm, but you're not a lawyer, are you? It's a reach for a non-lawyer settlement firm to claim it gets out-of-court settlements; perhaps you should tone down your rhetoric. If you were a law firm, creditors would have to deal with you but since you're not, the law allows creditors to completely ignore you. Do your clients understand that their creditors have no legal obligation to deal with you at all?
maryland contractor, please think carefully before trying for settlement. Be aware creditors have *no* legal obligation to deal with settlement firms. Creditors have to deal with your attorney by law but not with settlement firms. The risk you run is your creditor will refuse to work with your settlement firm and send your debt to collections or to court anyway. The settlement firm will keep collecting its fees from your escrow account while your debt continues to grow from accruing interest and late fees. I suggest you consult an attorney re. your financial condition. There's something called fiduciary duty that your attorney has to meet. Whatever advice your attorney gives you has to benefit you and you alone. Beware a settlement firm has no fiduciary duty to you. Your settlement firm can legally give you advice that maximizes profits for the firm.
A Ridge called today I couldn't even hear her at all,, a lot of static on the line!!! she wanted to help "defend myself and my company " wanted to prove financial distress, !!!!!! Then wanted $1000.000.. About a lawsuit that I am going through ,!!!!! What lawsuit ???? Wouldn't give me a case # for the this lawsuit either .........................
very pushy a bit rude told her to send me some info on her company never received it! Nor do I ever want her to call my office again! What is the purpose of the national do not call line? When I asked questions she interrupt me not once but twice.. Great customer service ...