Murdock, you try to collect on debts that you cannot validate (and probably don't even own) and violate the FDCPA on a regular basis (who is the idiot?). Speaking of repeated calls, "Mr. Murdock" alledgedly had some repeated calls himself from a group of phone pranksters
Hello David Murdock you can't block all the numbers you want. This is the guy that started all of this. Next time don't threatening anyone with jail time.
P.S Everyone LOOK UP The Prosecutor prank calls on youtube.com. David Murdock will make your day.
Rang wireline. Left no message. Number blocked. Strange to call this number because no derogatory info at credit bureaus, no judgments, no liens, no pending litigations.
Those who owe money ought to pay it.Just because the collector is rude does not legitimate not paying an honest debt. Violating laws restricting the method of collection are grounds for seek redress at law through civil lawsuits, assistance from administrative agencies, and state Attorney Generals.
Owing has its time barred limitation based on federal and state statutes of limitations (time before loan goes stale/expires). There are also laws, particularly the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) that limits the ways a collector may contact a debtor; and requirements of proof including to whom the debt was originally owed, how much, for what, and the authority upon which a third party has a right to collect. See this: http://www.federalreserve.gov/boarddocs/supmanual/cch/fairdebt.pdf and this: http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0117-time-barred-debts; and this: http://www.consumer.ftc.gov/articles/0149-debt-collection . While a debtor may demand in writing that further phone contacts cease, such cease and desist notice may trigger a law suit.